Questions concerning a Producer working for the selection committee at Cannes

Categorized as Alleged Conflict of Interest, Community Posts Tagged , ,

Mélissa Malinbaum holds dual roles that potentially generate an alleged conflict of interest within the realm of film production and festival adjudication. She is a member of the Cannes Film Festival short film committee while simultaneously serving as the producer for Oren Gerner’s short film, ‘Gabriel.’ This film was showcased in the Short Film Competition (Official Selection) in 2018, an event co-ordinated by the same committee on which Malinbaum serves.

An alleged conflict of interest arises when an individual’s personal interests potentially interfere with their ability to act in the best interests of the organization or event they are serving. In legal terms, conflicts of interest are typically discussed in fiduciary law, where a person is obligated to act in the best interest of another person or organization. A classic legal example of a conflict of interest is an attorney who tries to represent both parties in a dispute. Similarly, in this case, Malinbaum is serving both as a producer for a specific film and as a member of the selection committee for the festival where the film is screened.

When a producer, such as Malinbaum, is in a position to influence the selection of films at a festival and uses that position to promote a film they have produced, it can be perceived as an alleged conflict of interest. This is because the selection should be made based on the quality and merits of the films, not the personal or financial interests of members of the selection committee. Furthermore, this situation could disadvantage other filmmakers who lack similar connections within the festival organization.

Thus, the dual roles of Malinbaum, both as a producer of ‘Gabriel’ and as a member of the Cannes Film Festival short film committee, create a clear alleged potential for conflict of interest. This has, allegedly, serious implications for the fair and transparent functioning of such a prestigious festival, possibly undermining the integrity of the selection process. Please note the similarity with the alleged case of Producer Dominique Welinski.

IMPORTANT NOTE: Please note that this article is not meant to be an ad hominem attack on any specific person. The individuals mentioned and their positions in various organizations are used as examples for the way that the film industry operates. The positions, roles and professional relationship between individuals are public information. Sources are provided throughout the website. If you would like to report any inaccuracy please do not hesitate to contact usOur aim is to improve and democratize the film industry by analyzing the way its institutions are set-up. In order to do so, we must list those organizations and the people who work for them or with them, and their relationship with each other. Also, to be clear, there are certainly much bigger fish in the swamp than the individuals listed below but we publish information which is available to us and which was brough to our attention. If you can disclose further information about other individuals or organizations, please contact us.

SOURCES:

https://www.cannescourtmetrage.com/en/actualites/cannes-2020-the-short-films-competition – A list of selection committee at the Cannes Film Festival.

https://pro.imdb.com/title/tt8296610/ – The film Gabriel on IMDB. Producer: Melissa Malinbaum.

https://www.festival-cannes.com/en/f/gabriel/ – Gabriel on the official Cannes website.

‘Gabriel’ in Cannes’ official website, the film was part of the Official Selection in 2018:

Melissa listed as a selection committee member on Cannes’ official website:

Melissa listed Gabriel’s IMDB page as the sole Producer of the film.

‘Gabrial’ on Cannes’ website – note that the name of the producer is absent in this case, allegedly to avoid detection.

Our organization is dedicated to unveiling the true decision-making processes and power dynamics within the film industry. The chart below provides a comprehensive summary of these elements. Our goal is to democratize access and provide talented, emerging young filmmakers with the opportunities they rightfully deserve to succeed in the industry.

Feedback and Corrections
If you believe your or company’s name was listed on this website unjustly, please CONTACT US.

With unwavering support from our community, Film Industry Watch proudly announces the creation of a $25,000 Whistleblower Fund. This pivotal initiative is devoted to identifying and exposing nepotism and misconduct in the film industry. Our aim is to cultivate an atmosphere of transparency and accountability, ensuring an equitable and principled environment for all industry members. We encourage anyone aware of criminal activities or misconduct to reach out to us confidentially. Rest assured, your identity will be protected. Reports leading to articles posted on this website, significant organizational changes or legal proceedings will be eligible for a financial reward for between $100 to $5000 for each report.

We hold a special focus on Film Festivals, Screenwriting Labs, various awards, and public Film Funds. It’s important to remind our readers that these entities are predominantly supported by public funding, which necessitates a standard of fairness and transparency in their operations.

Stand with us in our quest for integrity in the film industry – your voice matters.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *